AZGFD, regional business leaders address Mexican wolf recovery plan

Agency says plan builds on best available science, local business owners say more wolves mean more revenue

Endangered Mexican wolves roam wilderness areas near the Arizona-New Mexico border.

Photo/Creative Commons

Endangered Mexican wolves roam wilderness areas near the Arizona-New Mexico border.

PHOENIX — The Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) submitted its official comments on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) draft Mexican wolf recovery plan Aug. 29. The plan, when finalized, will outline a science-based strategy for continuing the successful reintroduction of Mexican wolves in the species’ historic range.

The USFWS developed the draft recovery plan to replace the outdated 1982 plan. The updated plan was done in collaboration with state wildlife agencies in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah and Colorado, along with independent scientists from universities in the U.S. and Mexico, nongovernmental organizations and members of the 2010-13 Science and Planning Team.

The updated draft plan released in June continues to build upon the successful recovery program, which has seen the Mexican wolf population more than double since 2009 to at least 113 wolves in the wild.

“This draft Mexican wolf recovery plan is the product of years of collaboration and coordination with federal agencies in Mexico, independent and university wolf experts, as well as state, federal and tribal agencies in the U.S.,” AZGFD Assistant Director Jim deVos wrote in a letter to the USFWS. “The Arizona Game and Fish Department is committed to continue our long-standing cooperation in recovering the Mexican wolf and this plan, based on the most current and best available science.”

In comments delivered to USFWS, AZGFD sought clarification on the state’s authority to determine and implement release strategies, along with detailed criteria for delisting the Mexican wolf as an endangered species.

The draft plan acknowledges that the latest scientific research and data are contributing to the ongoing success of Mexican wolf recovery in Arizona. It formally recognizes the wolf’s historical range, which encompasses southeastern Arizona (south of Interstate 40), southwestern New Mexico and the nation of Mexico — where 90 percent of its historical habitat can be found.

A group of regional business leaders, however, has also written a joint letter to the USFWS requesting Mexican wolves to be introduced into areas north of I-40. The group, which includes business owners, managers and self-employed contractors from northern Arizona and southern Utah, said revenue gained from wolf tourism would benefit local economies. The group cited examples of increased revenue at Yellowstone National Park after gray wolves made a recovery in the area.

The group also said in the letter that reintroduction of an apex predator would benefit the ecosystem by helping control elk and mule deer populations in sensitive areas.

Emily Renn, executive director of the Grand Canyon Wolf Recovery Project, said placing a hard boundary line, such as the I-40 corridor, on a species that is known to travel far distances to find prey and establish territory would be a challenge.

A recovery team commissioned by the USFWS also determined in a 2012 report that the Grand Canyon would be a suitable place to establish a population of the species, although AZGFD contends the possibility of interbreeding between Mexican wolves and the more dominant northern gray wolves could have drastic genetic consequences for the small population.

Under the draft plan, AZGFD seeks to continue its efforts to increase Mexican wolf genetic diversity by strategically placing captive-born wolf pups into wild dens, a process known as “cross-fostering,” as a viable way to infuse under-represented genetics into the wild population.

“Only 10 captive wolves (six of which were cross-fostered pups) have been released into the U.S. since 2009 and in that time the population has doubled, almost entirely because of natural reproduction,” deVos wrote. “Cross-fostering minimizes the erosion of social tolerance due to the negative behaviors often associated with the release of captive-raised adults.”

In June 2015, AZGFD filed a lawsuit against the secretary of the Department of Interior and USFWS seeking an updated recovery plan — a requirement of the Endangered Species Act, as the current plan was last updated in 1982. In April 2016, the USFWS signed a settlement agreement with AZGFD and Defenders of Wildlife to complete a final revised Mexican Wolf Recovery Plan by the end of November 2017.

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.